Qwen 3.8 27B Coding Benchmark
How Qwen 3.8 27B ranks on the LLM Coding Leaderboard, shown next to the three models directly above and below it, with the top three models included for reference.
- Last evaluated: 5 days ago (October 2, 2026), with OpenCode.
| # | Model | Total points (max 80) |
Avg cost per prompt |
Avg time per prompt |
Video | Tested with | Points per project | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Laravel Code Quality
(max 20) |
React-TS Code Quality
(max 20) |
Bug Finding Test
(max 20) |
CSV Import (PHP) | Offline Sync (PHP) | Bank Feed (Dart / Flutter) | Shipping Quotes (Go) | |||||||
| 1 | GPT-6.1-Sol (High) | 68.1 | $0.22 | 07:26 | Codex CLI | 19.1 | 19 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| 2 | Opus 5.5 (High) | 67.41 | $0.79 | 03:10 | Claude Code | 18.5 | 19.33 | 9.58 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| 3 | GPT-6.1-Sol (Medium) | 67.09 | $0.14 | 03:53 | Codex CLI | 18.63 | 18.67 | 9.79 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| ⋯ 26 places not shown ⋯ | |||||||||||||
| 30 | Deepseek-V4-Pro-0813 (Max) | 50.35 | $0.05 | 09:06 | OpenCode | 17.3 | 16.5 | 4.9 | 1.9 | 3.25 | 4 | 2.5 | |
| 31 | Tencent Hy3 (High) | 49.87 | $0.05 | 06:35 | OpenCode | 16.8 | 14.33 | 2.29 | 3.2 | 3.75 | 4.5 | 5 | |
| 32 | Deepseek-V4-Pro-0813 (High) | 48.34 | $0.04 | 07:15 | OpenCode | 17.25 | 16.33 | 2.71 | 2.4 | 3.25 | 4 | 2.4 | |
| 33 | Qwen 3.8 27B (Xhigh) | 47.76 | $0.45 | 23:22 | OpenCode | 17.23 | 15.67 | 2.71 | 4.2 | 2.75 | 3 | 2.2 | |
| 34 | GLM-5.3-Flash (Max) | 47.51 | $0.02 | 08:54 | OpenCode | 17.2 | 17.17 | 4.69 | 2.5 | 2.45 | 1.5 | 2 | |
| 35 | Gemini-3.8-Flash (High) | 47.09 | N/A | 02:56 | Antigravity | 14.8 | 16.67 | 5.42 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 2 | 2.2 | |
| 36 | LongCat-2.5-Preview | 46.65 | N/A | 16:50 | OpenCode | 16.98 | 16.67 | 2.4 | 3 | 2.7 | 4 | 0.9 | |
Tutorials about Qwen 3.8 27B
Video
· Aug 20, 2026
I Tested NEW Qwen 3.8 27B on 20 Coding Prompts
How to read this
- Each score measures a model-and-harness configuration, not the model in isolation.
- Prices are calculated with API costs. Models tested on a subscription plan show N/A.
- Full methodology and scoring formulas are explained in this article.
See every tested model side by side on the full LLM Coding Leaderboard.
