Back to the full leaderboard

Fable 5.2 Coding Benchmark

Notify me when a new model is benchmarked

New rankings go out in the weekly AI Coding Daily newsletter. Unsubscribe anytime.

How Fable 5.2 ranks on the LLM Coding Leaderboard, shown next to the three models directly above and below it, with the top three models included for reference.

Last evaluated: 2 days ago (November 10, 2026), with Claude Code.

# Model Total points
(max 90)
Avg cost
per prompt
Avg time
per prompt
Video Tested with Points per project Consistency penalty
Laravel Code Quality
(max 20)
React-TS Code Quality
(max 20)
Bug Finding Test
(max 10)
Python Code Quality
(max 20)
Edge-case Testing
(4 projects, max 20)
1 Opus 5.5 (High) 85.43 $0.83 03:42
Claude Code
18.68 19 9.58 18.17 20 0
2 GPT-6-Astra (High) 84.82 $0.96 04:34
Codex CLI
18.6 18.17 9.58 18.47 20 0
3 GPT-6-Astra (Medium) 84.53 $0.69 03:08
Codex CLI
18.2 17.83 10 18.5 20 0
4 Fable 5.2 (Medium) 84.35 $1.42 03:03
Claude Code
19.13 19.5 9.17 17.8 18.75 0
5 GPT-6.1-Sol (High) 84 $0.23 04:19
Codex CLI
18.5 18.83 9.17 18 19.5 0
6 Opus 5.5 (Medium) 83.73 $0.57 02:20
Claude Code
18.95 18.5 8.33 18.5 19.5 −0.05
7 GPT-6.1-Sol (Medium) 83.32 $0.15 02:24
Codex CLI
18.17 18 9.38 18.27 19.5 0

Videos about Fable 5.2


How to read this

  • Each score measures a model-and-harness configuration, not the model in isolation.
  • Prices are calculated with API costs. Models tested on a subscription plan show N/A.
  • Full methodology and scoring formulas are explained in this article.

See every tested model side by side on the full LLM Coding Leaderboard.

Povilas Korop

Get Weekly AI Coding News

Sent every Wednesday. No spam, ever. Unsubscribe anytime.