Composer 2.5 Coding Benchmark
How Composer 2.5 ranks on the LLM Coding Leaderboard, shown next to the three models directly above and below it.
- Composer 2.5 — place #28, 5.6 points (max 20). Last evaluated on August 11, 2026, with Cursor.
| # | Model | Total points (max 20) |
Avg cost per prompt |
Avg time per prompt |
Video | Tested with | Points per project (max 5) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSV Import (PHP) | Offline Sync (PHP) | Bank Feed (Dart/Flutter) | Shipping Quotes (Go) | |||||||
| 25 | Gemini-3.1-Pro | 10.1 | $0.52 | 03:04 | OpenCode | 1.9 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 2.2 | |
| 26 | Deepseek-V4-Flash (High) | 8.2 | $0.02 | 06:31 | OpenCode | 1.9 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 1.6 | |
| 27 | Minimax M3 | 7.95 | $0.21 | 06:32 | OpenCode | 3.5 | 0.95 | 1.9 | 1.6 | |
| 28 | Composer 2.5 | 5.6 | $0.10 | 02:41 | Cursor | 2.2 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 1.1 | |
| 29 | GPT-5.6-Luna (Low) | 5.1 | $0.01 | 01:36 | Codex CLI | 3 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.2 | |
Tutorials about Composer 2.5
Video
· May 20, 2026
I Tested NEW Composer 2.5. Wow. (Updated LLM Benchmark)
How to read this
- Each score measures a model-and-harness configuration, not the model in isolation.
- Prices are calculated with API costs. Models tested on a subscription plan show N/A.
- Full methodology and scoring formulas are explained in this article.
See every tested model side by side on the full LLM Coding Leaderboard.
