Muse Ember 1.0 Coding Benchmark
How Muse Ember 1.0 ranks on the LLM Coding Leaderboard, shown next to the three models directly above and below it, with the top three models included for reference. Muse Ember 1.0 was tested at 2 effort levels, each ranked separately.
Last evaluated: 2 days ago (November 10, 2026), with OpenCode.
| # | Model | Total points (max 90) |
Avg cost per prompt |
Avg time per prompt |
Video | Tested with | Points per project | Consistency penalty | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Laravel Code Quality
(max 20) |
React-TS Code Quality
(max 20) |
Bug Finding Test
(max 10) |
Python Code Quality
(max 20) |
Edge-case Testing (4 projects, max 20) |
||||||||
| 1 | Opus 5.5 (High) | 85.43 | $0.83 | 03:42 |
Claude Code |
18.68 | 19 | 9.58 | 18.17 | 20 | 0 | |
| 2 | GPT-6-Astra (High) | 84.82 | $0.96 | 04:34 |
Codex CLI |
18.6 | 18.17 | 9.58 | 18.47 | 20 | 0 | |
| 3 | GPT-6-Astra (Medium) | 84.53 | $0.69 | 03:08 |
Codex CLI |
18.2 | 17.83 | 10 | 18.5 | 20 | 0 | |
| ⋯ 31 places not shown ⋯ | ||||||||||||
| 35 | GPT-6-Luna (High) | 67.47 | $0.01 | 03:51 |
Codex CLI |
16.9 | 15.83 | 5.31 | 15.53 | 15 | −1.10 | |
| 36 | Qwen 3.8 Flash (Xhigh) | 67.47 | $0.04 | 08:38 |
OpenCode |
16.35 | 17.67 | 5.42 | 16.33 | 13.2 | −1.50 | |
| 37 | Deepseek-V4-Pro-0813 (Max) | 67.18 | $0.05 | 09:06 |
OpenCode |
17.3 | 16.5 | 4.9 | 17.83 | 11.65 | −1.00 | |
| 38 | Muse Ember 1.0 (Max) | 66.94 | $0.03 | 02:16 |
OpenCode |
15.95 | 16.67 | 6.77 | 14.33 | 14.7 | −1.48 | |
| 39 | MiMo-V2.6 Flash (High) | 64.74 | $0.04 | 17:56 |
OpenCode |
17.83 | 17.5 | 7.81 | 14.1 | 10.15 | −2.65 | |
| 40 | Deepseek-V4-Pro-0813 (High) | 64.64 | $0.04 | 07:15 |
OpenCode |
17.25 | 16.33 | 2.71 | 17.3 | 12.05 | −1.00 | |
| 41 | Mistral Large 4 (High) | 64.39 | $0.18 | 05:30 |
OpenCode |
17.78 | 18.5 | 3.13 | 15.03 | 12.4 | −2.45 | |
| 42 | Muse Ember 1.0 (High) | 63.32 | $0.02 | 01:50 |
OpenCode |
16.05 | 15.17 | 6.25 | 13.8 | 15.2 | −3.15 | |
| 43 | Tencent Hy4 (High) | 63.31 | $0.45 | 16:32 |
OpenCode |
18.05 | 16.83 | 4.58 | 15 | 10.65 | −1.80 | |
| 44 | Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) | 62.27 | N/A | 06:51 |
OpenCode |
15.9 | 16.67 | 6.15 | 11.9 | 12.65 | −1.00 | |
| 45 | Tencent Hy3 (High) | 61.9 | $0.05 | 06:35 |
OpenCode |
16.8 | 14.33 | 2.29 | 14.03 | 16.45 | −2.00 | |
Videos about Muse Ember 1.0
Video
· Nov 11, 2026
I Tested NEW Muse Ember on Coding (also Carbon and Subs Updates)
How to read this
- Each score measures a model-and-harness configuration, not the model in isolation.
- Prices are calculated with API costs. Models tested on a subscription plan show N/A.
- Full methodology and scoring formulas are explained in this article.
See every tested model side by side on the full LLM Coding Leaderboard.
